Tuesday, September 15, 2015

How Ethical is Kairos?

At first, the ancient Greek notion of Kairos seems incredibly straightforward. Akin to ethos, logos, and pathos, Kairos initially struck me as a simple extension of these methods of persuasion, another aspect to take into consideration when developing rhetoric. However, closer analysis reveals the nuance of the matter.

Take Kairos as an ethical or moral dilemma. Appealing to one’s own credibility, crafting logical arguments, and emphasizing the emotional response to certain topics are all quite aboveboard means of persuasion. Kairos, however, can be seen as their sly cousin. To use Kairos, in my opinion, could be taken as deceptive and conniving.

Utilizing the ideals of Kairos – the cliché “to strike while the iron is hot” – is generally a perfectly valid rhetorical facet to keep in mind when constructing arguments and appeals. To capitalize on the germaneness of a certain issue is perfectly reasonable. However, I contest that fabricating one’s own Kairotic situation is an underhand ploy, one that validates the stereotypical misunderstanding that rhetoric is deceptive.

As students in class, the example blogs provided, and the book itself detailed, one can easily manufacture one’s own Kairos by, for example, buttering up your parent before making a request that would normally fall short. In this context, Kairos is an unnecessary crutch to a poor argument/appeal. If one’s rhetoric requires this sort of artificial Kairos, perhaps it’s meaningful that the argument wasn’t effective enough to succeed without it.

When the situation creates its own Kairos, such as the shootings at Virginia Tech or President Obama’s smoking habit resurfacing around New Years, utilizing Kairos in an invaluable way to seize the fleeting nature of opportunity in the fast-paced world we live in. However, to artificially manufacture Kairos is an underhanded tactic that unethically inflates the effectiveness of one’s rhetoric. When an argument cannot stand on its own and requires groveling to a parent or necessitates support in the form of false Kairos, utilizing the ancient ideal gets more complicated.


While there is value in understanding and exercising Kairos in plenty of rhetorical situation, there are certain complications, be they ethical or otherwise, that one must consider.

Monday, August 31, 2015

If Churchill Knew Calculus, Could He Make the NY Times?

Honestly, coming up with something to write about for this passion blog has plagued me for over a week. Perhaps my muted enthusiasm doesn’t constitute passion; hours and hours of brain wracking have yielded at least a few viable topics, though. I’m the sure the title might’ve caught you off guard, but allow me to explain.

My first topic revolves around the pithy aphorisms of the esteemed Winston Churchill. I’ve always found his oft-quoted sayings to not only reflect his direct candor, but also to demonstrate an inner intellectualism that can be detected upon slightly deeper inspection of the language and meaning of his most famous expressions. I hope that through a thorough analysis of select quotes, I can uncover the contained meanings while applying the lessons learned to my own life in order to create an analytically intriguing and increasingly applicable blog.

As much as I find Churchill’s words interesting, they light no fire in me like mathematics does. My true passion lies therein, but I have qualms about developing a blog revolving about the mother of all sciences. I’d like to cite examples from popular math texts and expound upon them in an attempt to cultivate appreciation for mathematics and to instill fondness for its elegance and beauty. I worry that this topic is simply not applicable enough to a majority of students, but I believe that channeling the deep passion I have for it, in the proper medium and with appropriate examples, could create an engaging blog.

Finally, I am acutely aware of my own dismal participation (read: lack thereof) as a citizen of this nation. In an attempt to inform both myself and my readership, I think another interesting blog idea would be to read and analyze the cover story of an issue of the New York Times each week. In doing so, I would attempt to not merely summarize but to dissect, synthesize, and disseminate the more important facets of each cover story. In an era of compartmentalized information being boiled down to 140 character messages and 15 second sound-bytes, a thorough analysis of good old newsprint could be especially rewarding.

Friday, August 28, 2015